A)a 2-page(maximum)critique of the articles. The critique must discuss both related media articles for roughly the same amount. For each article, the critique should touch on matters such as, but not limited to,whether the article:x Accurately communicated the research findings (e.g., did they misrepresent the findings?). In either case, how did they accurately or inaccurately represent the findings? (Provide examples.) If they were inaccurate, what could they have said instead?x Omitted or adequately captured important nuances or caveats(e.g., did they speak to noteworthy limitations?) If something was omitted, why is that important? If they adequately captured nuance, provide an example of how.Also, contrast the articles. (IW¶V XS WR \RX ZheWheU WR dR WhiV afWeU UeYieZiQg eachor making these points as you review each.) Answer questions like:xWhich article was more accurate? x Which article was more appropriately nuanced? x Which article would be more appealing to a general audience? Support your positions. B)your own media article about the journal article(1-page maximum). The article should be geared to a lay audience (i.e., non-experts). It should be something your fUieQdV aQd faPiO\ ZhR haYeQ¶W VWXdied SV\chRORg\ VhRXOd be abOe WR XQdeUVWaQd aQd appreciate.
