1, A direct challenge to a peer’s initial post. The challenge can consist of:
– Explaining why the theory is weak and limited
– Demonstrating that from a different view your point is better supported than
theirs
2, Empirical support and justification
-Do not simply say a post is bad. Articulate why it is bad and what is needed to
improve. Illustrate limitations or holes in the argument
– Even if you agree with the post, play devil’s advocate and argue the other side!
3, Provide an alternative solution
-Describe an alternative solution to explain the social phenomenon.
-There are no black and white answers with vast shades of gray. Justify your shade of gray with evidence. Show the class and me why your shade of gray is a better choice
