1- Revocation and Acceptance. On Thursday, Dennis mailed a letter to Tanya’s office offering to sell his car to her for $3,000. On Saturday,having changed his mind, Dennis senta fax to Tanya’s office revoking his offer. Tanya did not go to her office over the weekend and thus did not learn about the revocation until Monday morning, just a few minutes after she had mailed a letter of acceptance to Dennis. When Tanya demanded that Dennis sell his carto her as promised, Dennis claimed that no contract existed because he had revoked his offer prior to Tanya’s acceptance. Is Dennis correct?Explain.
2- Bargained-for Exchange. On Brenda Sniezek’s firstday of work for the Kansas City ChiefsFootball Club, she signed a document that compelledarbitration of any disputes that shemight have with the Chiefs. In the document, Sniezekpromised that on the arbitrator’sdecision, she would release the Chiefs from any relatedclaims. Nowhere in the documentdid the Chiefs agree to do anything in return forSniezek’s promise. Was there considerationfor the arbitration provision? Explain.
[Sniezek v.Kansas City Chiefs Football Club, 402S.W.3d 580 (Mo.App. W.D. 2013)]
3- . Intoxicación. After Kira had had several drinks one night, she sold Charlotte a diamond necklace worth thousands of dollars for one hundred dollars. The next day, Kira offered the one hundred dollars to Charlotte and requested the return of her necklace. Charlotte refused to accept the money or return the necklace, claiming that she and Kira had a valid contract of sale. Kira explained that she had been intoxicated at the time the bargain was made and thus the contract was voidable at her option. WasKira correct? Explain
