Technology Plus’s Benefit Dilemma
Case Incident
Technology Plus’s Benefit Dilemma To stay competitive, many organizations today are choos-ing to restructure their benefit programs. Technology Plus is an example of such a company. Technology Plus has 150 employees, including upper management, skilled tradespersons, sales representatives, and customer service representatives. Five years ago, this company was enjoy-ing huge profits and could afford its current benefits pro-gram; however, times have changed, and now they need to find cost savings without laying off any of the staff. Up to this point, Technology Plus has offered all of its staff a premium benefits program, including much more than government-required benefits of employ-ment insurance, Canada Pension Plan, worker’s com-pensation, standard vacation of two weeks per year, and access to legislated leaves of absence. It offers group life insurance of three times salary, accidental death and
dismemberment insurance of three times salary, extended healthcare benefits (with vision care, dental care, hearing aids, and more), long-term disability of 75 percent of sal-ary (employer paid), and a defined benefit pension plan. It also provides a wellness program, an employee assist-ance plan, and many other services, such as subsidized childcare and assistance with eldercare. However, now the company needs your help in deciding how to restruc-ture its benefit plan to find significant cost savings but still provide meaningful benefit coverage for its employees.
Questions
1. In your opinion, what voluntary employer-sponsored benefits should this company maintain, and which ones should they not maintain? Why?
2. Would a flexible benefit program save this organization money if administered properly?
