Darryl Banks was charged with violating the state’s so-called ‘‘Peeping Tom’’ statute, which made punishable, as a misdemeanor, ‘‘any person who shall peep secretly into any room occupied by a female.’’ Banks contended that the statute was unconstitutional. Do you agree with Banks’ argument.

Subject: Criminal Law
Topic: IRAC analysis
It’s call an IRAC analysis there’s an example/explanation use the rubric Darryl Banks was charged with violating the state’s so-called ‘‘Peeping Tom’’ statute, which made punishable, as a misdemeanor, ‘‘any person who shall peep secretly into any room occupied by a female.’’ Banks contended that the statute was unconstitutional. Do you agree with Banks’ argument.