1. The Five Enemies 78
How do you understand that both the “robber” and the “respectable citizen” have “both lost the original simplicity of “man”? How do you understand this “original simplicity”? How do they lose it? How is this liked being caged?
(Note: Of course, the tree is an explicit reference to “uncarved wood”/original simplicity)
2. Great and Small 87
Why is it “in the light of Tao nothing is best, nothing is worst”?
Why is it “he who want to have right without wrong… does not understand the principles of heaven and earth”?
How is “the mind of the wise man” the “true conqueror”?
3. Confucius and the Madman 58
How do you understand the idea that “When the world makes sense/ The wise have work to do”? And, that “Never, never/ Teach virtue more”? (What’s the problem with teaching virtue?)
How do you understand that it is “useful… to be useless”? (Or, what is the problem with being “useful”?)
4. Tao 150
“To name a name is to delimit a ‘thing’.” How do names delimit things?
How do you understand, “Where there is no measure, there is no beginning of any ‘thing’“?
How do you understand that “Tao is beyond words and beyond things”? In what sense(s)?
How do you understand that “Tao is a name that indicates without defining”?
5. You can pick a passage of your choosing from anywhere in the Chuang Tzu and analyze it. If you do this, make sure you clearly indicate what passage you’re referring to; use both the title and page number to this end. Again, the idea is to examine the passage, or just a section or even just a quote from the passage in light of one or more of the “foundational ideas” (and as noted below, emptiness and original simplicity are especially significant). Also, as with all the prompts, the idea is to reference at least two other readings that were assigned for this module.
