These articles talk about ‘disruptive innovation’ originally argued and developed by Christensen. Although disruptive innovation has been really popular among both business scholars and practitioners, the application to the real business cases is likely to bring controversial arguments due to its theoretical ambiguity.
These three articles are good examples how different scholars have different opinions on disruptive innovation. While the first article written by Christensen gives you a general understanding of disruptive innovation, the second and third article shows an opposing opinion on the original idea argued by Christensen (e.g., concept, uber case).
1. Summarize first article (written by Christensen) – 1-page max
2. After reading all three articles, what is your opinion on disruptive innovation? Pick a good example which may fit the concept of disruptive innovation. Briefly describe why you think so based on your own understanding about disruptive innovation (picking up the same case in the articles (e.g., uber) is also accepted if you have a good reason)– 2-page max
Format: Single space, 12, Times New roman, Margin 1.
