Explain in your own words why Vātsāyana and other Nyāya philosophers think that 3.1.1 says something true. What is their best argument, or arguments, in support of the claim? How do they understand the terms that appear in 3.1.1?

Essay Part 1: Explaining the Argument

Here’s what is said in 3.1.1: “Because one grasps the same object through sight and touch, there is a self that is distinct from the body and sense organs”.

Read entire chapter and content in the text that elucidates 3.1.1 (especially
the elucidation of the argument offered by Vātsāyana from the bottom of p. 80 through most of
p. 81).

in about 400 words, explain in your own words why Vātsāyana and other Nyāya philosophers think that 3.1.1 says something true. What is their best argument, or arguments,
in support of the claim? How do they understand the terms that appear in 3.1.1?

Essay Part 2: Responding to the argument

Come up with one or two persuasive reasons to think that the argument fails. Discuss the
reasons in detail, and why they count as a reason to think that the argument fails. Consider how
someone like Vātsāyana might reply to your objections, and explain why you don’t think that
the reply is convincing.