It doesn’t matter how many different sources you use, but please refer to Tillich’s “The Courage to be” (PDF linked here) in the essay when possible.
“Please respond to the following:
In The Courage to Be Tillich begins by emphasizing that non being belongs to being. What does this mean? And how does this emphasis upon the fundamental character of non being lead to an interpretation of the experience of anxiety and of the need for an existential courage? We also find an emphasis upon nonbeing in Beauvoir’s account of existential ethics. Does this mean that Beauvoir in her own way elaborates an existential courage, a courage to be? Please explain.”
