In a paper of 1,000 words, address all of the following questions and provide evidence from the sources to support your claims. Remember to cite the source and the page number when you paraphrase or provide a quotation. Write an argument that explains the ethics used to justify the Tuskeegee, New Zealand, and Guatemala experiments. Include in this argument consideration of whether the lives of the experimental subjects were deemed to be as valid as the lives of non-subjects and how their contribution to the social good as experimental subjects might “offset” their cost to the state because of their race, class, or criminal history. Demonstrate a clear definition of the use of racial science in these experiments and identify and discuss eugenic elements in them as well. Include an analysis of how these experiments contributed to modern medical ethics laws, including the concept of informed consent (look these up so you know what you are talking about and cite your sources). Then address the shortcomings of these laws, and any loopholes you find that permit further atrocities in the name of research. Are the ethics rules themselves the product of racial science and eugenics?
