By the way, in real-life , the applicable professional code – finally – changed. Now, attorneys are allowed to provide minimal but sufficient information to put a third party on notice if they reasonably believe their client might imminently try to kill the third party.
Seven-Part Question
1. How would an egoist in Jim’s shoes have responded? Please explain.
2. How would a social group relativist in Jim’s situation have responded?
3. How would a cultural relativist in Jim’s situation have responded?
4. How would a utilitarian in Jim’s situation have responded?
5. How would a deontologist in Jim’s situation have responded? Explain.
6. How would a virtue ethicist in Jim’s situation have responded? Explain.
7 How did Jim respond did he use? Explain. Also, would you have responded as Jim? Why/why not? Also, what ethical theory would you have used? Again, explain.
