Public International Law
Critically assess the utility and appropriateness of ‘universal jurisdiction’ for bringing individuals accused of violations of international law to account.
2,500 words excluding footnotes please use OSCOLA Referencing style
Ideally would be great if you can answer the question using the case of Yugoslavia and look at who was accused of violations of international law and how were they accountable for it. Please also refer to other examples to back up your arguments on the Yugoslavian case I have attached 3 cases one is on genocide so please read through them.
Look at the following as a focus for the critical assessment:
Statute of the International Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the Former Yugoslavia since 1991
