What is the ‘interpretive’ method in legal theory, as developed by Ronald Dworkin? Why does Dworkin think it is a form of anti-positivism? Do you find it convincing?
Reference Style: OSCOLA
Refer to marking scheme and aim for first class 70 marks or just below
Make sure it does not exceed 2000 words and the ‘do you find it convincing’ part of question is expanded and done adequately
Summative question (Again):
What is the ‘interpretive’ method in legal theory, as developed by Ronald Dworkin? Why does Dworkin think it is a form of anti-positivism? Do you find it convincing?
