Read the information about social justice. http://s3.amazonaws.com/thf_media/2009/pdf/hl_1138.pdf
Then read the article here about the Philando Castile case. https://time.com/4400930/philando-castile/
Last, you will need to refer to the Code of Ethics for the Society of Professional Journalists. https://www.spj.org/ethicscode.asp
Identify and summarize the main points of the case or article.
Social justice has a varied history and a variety of implications. If one of the major tenets of journalism is to minimize harm, how do cases like Castile (if at all) go against this important principle?
What major ethical principle does the case violate, if any?
Does the case support a major ethical principle?
Lastly, what is your opinion of the trend(s) presented based on your knowledge of ethics and morality?
Feel free to use other similar cases to support your ideas and thoughts.
