1) Create your own argument using the Toulmin Model (min 3 sentences).
The argument must have:
• a claim/assertion of a point
• ground/evidence
• warrant/commentary on evidence
2) Define the Post Hoc Fallacy and also provide an example sentence(s) of the Post Hoc Fallacy (min 2 sentences)
3) Using your own words, define a fact claim and also provide an example sentence of a fact claim (min 2 sentences)
4) Using your own words, define a value claim and also provide an example sentence of a value claim (min 2 sentences)
5) Using your own words, define a policy claim and also provide an example sentence of a policy claim (min 2 sentences)
6) Define the Hasty Generalization Fallacy and also provide an example sentence(s) of the Hasty Generalization Fallacy (min 2 sentences)
Definition & example cannot be one of mine from the lecture!
7) Define the Appeal to Ignorance Fallacy and also provide an example sentence(s) of the Appeal to Ignorance Fallacy (min 2 sentences)
Definition & example cannot be one of mine from the lecture!
8) Define the Strawperson Fallacy and also provide an example sentence(s) of the Strawperson Fallacy (min 2 sentences)
Definition & example cannot be one of mine from the lecture!
9) Using your own words, provide a definition of a “fallacy” and also discuss the two ways that they can be persuasive to an audience (minimum 3 sentences).
10) What are the three parts of the Toulmin Model? Provide an explanation for each part and how they form an argument (min 3 sentences).
