Select a nonfictional leader who you feel has exhibited exemplary ethical conduct and do the following:
- Discuss two ethical traits your chosen leader has demonstrated.
- Explain how your chosen leader has exhibited ethical conduct
- Compare the deontological and consequentialist perspectives and how each perspective would approach the dilemma from the scenario.
- Explain which level of cognitive moral development (i.e., preconventional, conventional, or post conventional) is represented in the scenario for each of the following questions:
- Which action would most likely serve the greater good in society?
- If I reveal this information, will I get into trouble and possibly even lose my job?
- Which action best aligns with my long-held belief in the principle of justice?
- What do the laws say, and what would a law-abiding citizen do?
- If I keep quiet will I get some sort of reward?
- Reflect on your Ethical Lens Inventory (ELI) by doing the following:
- Explain your preferred ethical lens, or what it means to have a center perspective relevant to the ELI.
- Analyze whether you have the same preferred lens in different settings (e.g., work, personal, social).
- Explain both your primary values and classical virtue(s) from the ELI.
- Compare two primary values and one classical virtue from part D2 individually with three of the top five values from the Clarifying Your Values exercise.
- Describe one of the following from the ELI: your blind spot, risk, double standard, or vice.
- Discuss three steps you can take to mitigate the blind spot, risk, double standard, or vice described in part D3 in order to make better ethical decisions in the future.
- Discuss how you plan to use the ethical lens(es) to approach ethical situations throughout your professional life.
- Acknowledge sources, using in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.
- Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.
