What is the ‘interpretive’ method in legal theory, as developed by Ronald Dworkin? Why does Dworkin think it is a form of anti-positivism? Do you find it convincing?
‘Interpretive’ method in legal theory 1. What is the ‘interpretive’ method in legal theory, as developed by Ronald Dworkin? Why does Dworkin think it is a form of anti-positivism? Do you find it convincing?