Your final literature review should reflect a process of revision from the initial draft of your paper. Address the instructor’s and your peers’ comments from the initial draft and your presentation.
Your assignment should be in 12 pt. font, 1” margins, double-spaced, and at least 5 pages long.
Grading: This assignment is worth a maximum of 15 points and will be graded following the rubric below. Do not use any quotations longer than four words in this assignment. I expect you to paraphrase the articles in your own words.
RUBRIC | 3 points-Excellent | 2 points-Well Done | 1 points-Satisfactory | 0.5 points-Needs Improvement | 0 points-Inadequate |
Topic Sentences-
identify what will be discussed in the paragraph. |
|||||
Body Paragraphs-
support topic sentences with evidence from articles. Explain the method/argument/finding of each article mentioned, as appropriate. |
|||||
Introduction-
explain your topic and overall findings |
|||||
Conclusion-summarize literature, explain challenges, and suggest future directions | |||||
1 points-Excellent | 0.75 points-Well Done | 0.5 point-Satisfactory | 0.25 points-Needs Improvement | 0 points-Inadequate | |
Revision-successfully addresses comments from instructor and peers to substantially improve upon initial draft | |||||
1 points-Complete & Correct | 0.5 points- Mostly Complete & Correct | 0 points-Mostly Missing or Incorrect | |||
In-text Citations (APA/ASA) | |||||
Reference List (APA/ASA) |