Consider a structure that looks somehow like this:
1. Introduction: Relevance: Argumentation why the topic is relevant for science and in practical reasons. Derive your Research Question: What are the Possibilities and shortcomings of the agile concept for a public value oriented process design. – e.g. principles of the agile concept – how do they Forster public value orientation in processes
2. Clearify the theory/the concepts Since the agile concept is a very practical concept and born out of practical consideration. Is the literature you have read so far scientific literature? If there is a lack, you might also pose that as your research question and focus on underpinning the agile concept with theoretical approaches.
3. Method: Give an outlook how you will conduct your research (systematic literature review); how do you get data (literature). How do you select, which is relevant and so on. For a scientific claim it is important to be very systematic and retraceable for others what and how you are doing and if it fits to a scientific approach. Of course you need to cite and refer correctly (APA Style).
(4.) discussion part, Reflect your findings and the limitations. Then close with a (5.) conclusion I have also attached the proposal to give a better direction. And the public value score card that might help create the relationship with public value better. The scorecard takes 5 different factors into consideration to quantify public value.
