Arguments for hallucination need two paragraphs 500 words each for 1000 words total. Here are the two questions:
Question 1
Present and carefully explain the argument from hallucination. What do you think is the most promising objection to the argument from hallucination? Explain and motivate the objection, and be sure to clearly identify what premise of the argument from hallucination the objection denies. Critically evaluate the objection: Do you think the objection is successful, or do you think there is an adequate response to the objection? What conclusion do you draw about the merits of the argument from hallucination, and what it does or does not tell us about the nature of perception?
Question 2
Are colors objective, mind-independent properties of external objects? Present and carefully explain one potential argument or challenge for the view that colors are objective and mind-independent properties of external objects. What is the best possible response to this argument or problem, in your opinion, on behalf of an objective view of color? Is the response successful, or does the argument or challenge that you have chosen show that colors are mind-dependent/subjective in nature?
