Welcome to EssayHotline!

We take care of your tight deadline essay for you! Place your order today and enjoy convenience.

Assess the impact of informatics and information technology on organizational systems, change, and improvement.

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to develop a translation science project to support information systems change. Evidence translation is essential to drive actions and decisions to improve healthcare outcomes. Formulation of a comprehensive translation science project in information systems change supports the professional formation of the DNP scholar.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

  • CO1: Assess the impact of informatics and information technology on organizational systems, change, and improvement. (PO6)
  • CO2: Use information technology to collect and analyze data to generate evidence-based nursing practice across healthcare settings. (PO7)
  • CO3: Design programs that monitor and evaluate outcomes of care, care systems, and quality improvement. (PO7)

DUE DATE: Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 4. The Late Assignment Policy applies to this assignment.

TOTAL POSSIBLE POINTS: 250

PREPARING THE ASSIGNMENT:

Follow these guidelines when completing each component of this assignment. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.

  1. The assignment should be no less than 6 pages and no more than 8 pages (excluding title and reference pages and appended evidence tables).
  2. The assignment will include the following components:
    1. Title Page
    2. Introduction
      1. Purpose Statement
      2. Practice Problem Identification related to Information Systems Change
  • Role of Evidence to Address the Selected Practice Problem.
  1. Role of the DNP Practice Scholar in Evidence Translation
  1. Practice Problem and Question
    1. Significance
    2. Prevalence
  • Economic Ramifications
  1. Practice Problem Question in PICOT Format
  1. Evidence Synthesis of Literature to Address the Selected Practice Problem
    1. Scope of the Evidence Synthesis
    2. Main Points of Each Source
  • Comparison of Main Points across Sources
  1. Appraisal of the Evidence to Address the Selected Practice Problem
    1. Level of Evidence
    2. Quality Rating of Evidence
  • Suitability of the Evidence to Address the Selected Practice Problem
  1. Translation Path
    1. Potential Internal Factors for Consideration
    2. Potential External Factors for Consideration
  • Selected Translation or Change Model
  1. Evaluation Plan
  2. Anticipated Outcomes
  3. Strategies for Sustainability
  1. Conclusion
    1. Summation of the Impact of the Practice Problem
    2. Role of the Appraisal of Evidence to Address the Selected Practice Problem.
  • Summation of the Role of the DNP Practice Scholar in Evidence Translation
  1. Summary Tables of Evidence to Address the Selected Practice Problem using the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Evidence Summary Tool (Links to an external site.)
    1. Provides four sources of evidence to address the practice problem.
  2. APA Style and Organization
    1. APA Standards for Scholarly Papers
      • Level I Headings for the Following
        • Practice Problem and Question
        • Evidence Synthesis of Literature
        • Appraisal of the Evidence
        • Translation Path into Practice
        • Conclusion
        • References
        • Summary Tables of the Evidence
  1. Grammar and Mechanics
  2. Paper is 6-8 Pages (excluding Title and Reference Pages and appended Summary Tables)
  • Uses Required Evidence Summary Table
  1. To complete this assignment, please search from the Chamberlain library home page (Links to an external site.). Click the Everything tab to search using your keywords. This search field accesses over 70 large databases. Use the Journal Articles tab to search beyond these 70 databases in the WorldCat system. Federal and other open access sources are not included in the search functions and must be searched individually. To do this, search the open access article databases (Links to an external site.). For help, click the Database Tutorials tab in the Where To Find Help box on the library home page or contact a librarian (Links to an external site.).

All Chamberlain University policies related to plagiarism must be observed. This written assignment will not be screened for originality by TurnItIn

Rubric

NR706 Week 4 Information Systems Translation Science Project

NR706 Week 4 Information Systems Translation Science Project
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Introduction

Requirements: 1. Includes a focused purpose statement. 2. Identifies selected practice problem in general terms. 3. Discusses the role of evidence to address the selected practice problem. 4. Identifies the role of the DNP practice scholar in evidence translation.

20.0 pts

Highest Level of Performance

Includes no fewer than 4 requirements

17.0 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance

Includes no fewer than 3 requirements

16.0 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance

Includes no fewer than 2 requirements.

0.0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Includes 1 or fewer requirements.

20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Implications of the Practice Problem

Requirements: 1. Describes the significance of the practice problem. 2. Discusses the prevalence of the practice problem. 3. Discusses the economic ramifications of the practice problem. 4. States Practice Problem Question in PICOT Format.

40.0 pts

Highest Level of Performance

Includes no fewer than 4 requirements

34.0 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance

Includes no fewer than 3 requirements

31.0 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance

Includes no fewer than 2 requirements.

0.0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Includes 1 or fewer requirements.

40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Evidence Synthesis of Literature

Requirements: 1. Describes the scope of the evidence synthesis. 2. Discusses the main points of each source. 3. Compares main points across sources.

40.0 pts

Highest Level of Performance

Includes no fewer than 3 requirements

34.0 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance

Includes no fewer than 2 requirements

31.0 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance

Includes no less than 1 requirement.

0.0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

No requirements for this section presented.

40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Appraisal of the Evidence

Requirements: 1. Describes the levels of evidence. 2. Discusses the quality of evidence 3. Discusses the suitability of the evidence to address the practice problem.

40.0 pts

Highest Level of Performance

Includes no fewer than 3 requirements

34.0 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance

Includes no fewer than 2 requirements

31.0 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance

Includes no less than 1 requirement.

0.0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

No requirements for this section presented.

40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Translation Path

Requirements: 1. Identifies potential internal factors impacting the translation of evidence. 2. Identifies external internal factors impacting the translation of evidence. 3. Describes the selected translation/change model. 4. Describes an evaluation plan of the translation of evidence. 5. Discusses anticipated outcomes of the translation of evidence. 6. Describes strategies for sustainability.

40.0 pts

Highest Level of Performance

Includes no fewer than 6 requirements.

34.0 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance

Includes no fewer than 5 requirements

31.0 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance

Includes no fewer than 4 requirements.

0.0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Includes 3 or fewer requirements.

40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Conclusion

Requirements: 1. Includes a summation of the impact of the practice problem. 2. Includes a summation of the appraisal of evidence. 3. Includes a summation of the role of the DNP practice scholar in evidence translation.

20.0 pts

Highest Level of Performance

Includes no fewer than 3 requirements

17.0 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance

Includes no fewer than 2 requirements

16.0 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance

Includes no less than 1 requirement.

0.0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

No requirements for this section presented.

20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Evidence Summary Tool

Requirements: 1. Provides a complete summary of four sources of evidence.

30.0 pts

Highest Level of Performance

Includes no fewer than 4 requirements.

26.0 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance

Includes no fewer than 3 requirements

23.0 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance

Includes no fewer than 2 requirements.

0.0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Includes 1 or fewer requirements.

30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Style and Organization

Requirements: 1. Uses APA Standards for Scholarly Papers 2. Uses Level I Headings for the following • Practice Problem and Question • Evidence Synthesis of Literature • Appraisal of the Evidence • Translation Path into Practice • Conclusion • References • Summary Tables of the Evidence 3. Grammar and Mechanics are free of errors 4. Paper is 6-8 Pages (excluding Title and Reference Pages and appended Summary Tables) 5. Uses Required Evidence Summary Table

20.0 pts

Highest Level of Performance

Includes no fewer than 5 requirements

17.0 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance

Includes no fewer than 4 requirements

16.0 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance

Includes no fewer than 3 requirements.

0.0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Includes 2 or fewer requirements.

20.0 pts
Total Points: 250.0

PreviousNext

 

© 2024 EssayHotline.com. All Rights Reserved. | Disclaimer: for assistance purposes only. These custom papers should be used with proper reference.